Hans Rosling, Factfulness, 2018 [ ]
p.221
Who should you blame?
p.221
Similarly, resist the urge to blame the media for lying to you (mostly they are not) or for giving you a skewed worldview (which mostly they are, but often not deliberately). Resist blaming experts for focusing too much on their own interests and specializations or for getting things wrong (which sometimes they do, but often with good intentions). In fact, resist blaming any one individual or group of individuals for anything. Because the problem is that when we identify the bad guy, we are done thinking. And it's always always more complicated than that. It's almost always about multiple interacting causes──a system. If you really want to change the world, you have to understand how it actually works and forget about punching anyone in the face.
p.222
• Look for causes, not villians. When something goes wrong don't look for an individual or a group to blame. Accept that bad things can happen without anyone intending them to. Instead spend your energy on understanding the multiple interacting causes, or system, that created the situation.
• Look for systems, not heroes. When someone claims to have caused something good, ask whether the outcome might have happened anyway, even if that individual had done nothing. Give the system some credit.
(Hans Rosling with Ola Rosling and Anna Rosling Rönnlund, Factfulness : ten reasons we're wrong about the world ── and why things are better than you think, 155.9042 Rosling, 2018, )
• “The failure to see the world as humanly made is
called reification, which can also be defined
as the tendency to see the humanly made world
as having a will and force of its own, apart
from human beings. ... But if we talk about
technology as if it were a force in its own
right, the people who do the building and
choosing disappear. ... Reification keeps
us from seeing that the force attributed to
technology comes from PEOPLE choosing to do
things together in certain ways.
If we don't see this, we may forget to ask
important questions, such as, Who is choosing
to build what kinds of devices? Why?
How will our society be changed?
Who stands to benefit and who stands to lose
because of these changes? Should we avoid
these changes? Who will be held accountable
if these changes hurt people?”; pp.21-23,
Michael Schwalbe, The sociologically examined life, 1998.
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------->
No comments:
Post a Comment